Firm News

Religious Accommodations in the Workplace

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Groff v. DeJoy, Postmaster General which disrupts established law regarding religious accommodations in the workplace. The Court clarified that, in order to deny religious accommodations to employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers must demonstrate “substantial increased costs” in conducting their business to show undue hardship. The Court’s clarification thus upended longstanding precedent that a religious accommodation request could be denied if an employer demonstrated that the accommodation would cause “more than a de minimis cost.” The Court ruled that the “de minimis” standard, established nearly 50 years ago in the case Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, had been taken out of context and that the text of the Hardison decision actually shows that the undue hardship burden is meant to be much higher. Thus, the Groff Court describes their redefining of the undue hardship burden as a “clarifying decision” as opposed to a new standard.

This decision means that requests for religious accommodations in the workplace are held to essentially the same standard as those for requests based on a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Employers must grant requests for religious accommodations in the workplace unless they can prove that the cost of an accommodation is “excessive” or “unjustifiable.” Employers should carefully review their accommodation process and take Groff into account when evaluating requests for religious accommodations.

If you would like assistance establishing compliant procedures, please reach out to the Labor and Employment team.

 

Published by
Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson

Recent Posts

Mairead Dolan named Co-Managing Director of Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson

For Immediate Release: July 20, 2026 Media Contact: Lori Conway ∙ 303.861.2828 ∙ Lconway@williamsweese.com Denver,…

6 days ago

The Ninth Circuit Saved Arbitration Agreements, But the Bigger Battle May Lie Ahead

By: Mairead Dolan & Rena Meisler When the Ninth Circuit decided O’Dell v. Aya Healthcare…

4 weeks ago

Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson and Seven Directors Recognized By Chambers USA 2026

Denver – Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson and seven of its Directors have been recognized…

1 month ago

Four Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson Attorneys Earn Recognition as Top Lawyers by 5280 Magazine.

Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson proudly announced that four of its attorneys have received recognition…

6 months ago

Six Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson Attorneys Recognized As Leading Environmental Lawyers in U.S. by Lawdragon

January 26, 2026 – Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson is proud to announce that Directors…

6 months ago

Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson Earns Recognition as Top Law Firm for Women Attorneys by Denver Business Journal

Williams Weese Pepple & Ferguson has been recognized as a top law firm for women…

6 months ago